用户登陆搜 索 |
您的位置>> 首页 > 所有图书 > Ecological Sensitivity and Global Legal Pluralism:Rethinking the Trade and Environment Conflict
查看图书
图书目录:Table of Cases
1. Deconstructing the Trade and Environment Conflict: A Pluralistic Perspective 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1 Prologue: The Seattle 1999 Conference and the Clash between Trade and Environment Concerns 1.1.2 A Critique of the Contemporary Trade-Environment Conversation (a) First Blind-Spot: Global Legal Pluralism (b) Second Blind-Spot: The Trade-Environment Debate and the Nature/Society Dialectics 1.2 A New Framework for Understanding the Trade-Environment Nexus 1.2.1 Nature, Communication and Social Pluralism (a) Exposition (b) Decoding the Co-Determination Process of Nature, Societies and Consciousness 1.3 Interim Conclusions and the Structure of the Book 2. The Trade-Environment Problematic: Fantasy or Reality? 2.1 The Trade-Environment Conflict in the Eyes of Modern Economics: Critique and Reflection 2.1.1 Exposition 2.1.2 Reflection 2.2 The Asymmetry between the Trade and Environmental Domains 3. The GATT/WTO Trade-Environment Jurisprudence 3.1 The Mercantilist Ethos of the GATT and the Environment 3.2 The Legal Repercussions of the Mercantilist Ethos 3.2.1 The General Argument 3.2.2 The Influence of the Mercantilist Ethos on the Interpretation of Article XX (a) Exposition: The Analytic Structure of Trade- Environment Disputes in the GATT/WTO (b) The Tuna Panels 3.3 The WTO Environmental Jurisprudence 3.3.1 A New Environmental Vision (a) The Place of Article XX in the WTO Normative Hierarchy (b) Cognitive Openness (c) The Gap between the Trade and Environmental Realms 3.3.2 The Vision Realised: The Shrimp Reports (a) The First Report (b) The Second Report 3.4 Going Further: Guidelines to Environmental Sensitisation of the WTO and Remaining Barriers 3.4.1 Beyond the Shrimp Ruling: Basic Guidelines 3.4.2 Political Barriers: Status Report 3.4.3 Cognitive Dilemmas in the Application of Article XX (a) Exposition: The Appellate Body Approach to the Cognitive Problematic of Article XX (b) The Difficulties of Forming a More Pro-active Cognitive Strategy: Overload, Scarcity of Ecological Data, Social Legitimacy and Cultural Distortions 3.4.4 Judicial Activism: Structural Constraints in the Design of the DSU 3.5 Environmental Sensitisation: Institutional Solutions 3.5.1 New Structural Arrangements (a) Linking with Environmental IGOs (b) Environmental NGOs (c) Sharing Responsibility with the Parties 3.5.2 Procedural Changes: Shifting the Burden of Proof 3.6 Epilogue: After Cancun? 4. Science, Standardisation and the SPS/TBT Agreements 4.1 The Social Milieu of the SPS and TBT Agreements: The Unavoidable Risk of Blame 4.2 The Drive for Harmonisation: A Questionable Path for Legitimacy 4.3 Determining the Limits of State Regulatory Power 4.3.1 The Fallibility of Science and the Value of Pluralism 4.3.2 The Appellate Body SPS Case Law (a) The Hormones Case: Opening the Door for Open-Ended Risk-Assessment? (b ) Australia--Salmon: From Pluralism to Deference (c) Japan--Agriculture: The Precautionary Principle and the Incompleteness of Scientific Knowledge 4.3.3 The Non-Discrimination Requirement 4.4 Toward an Alternative Disciplinary Framework 5. Environmental Conflicts in the Private Realm of International Construction Law 5.1 The Politics of Ecological Co-existence 5.2 The Features of the Lex Constructionis as an Autonomous Legal System 5.2.1 The Basic Structure of the International Construction Market 5.2.2 The Emergence of the Lex Constructionis: Basic Communicative Patterns 5.2.3 The Institutional Setting of the Lex Constructionis: Exclusion and Dominance 5.3 Environmental Closure and Standard Construction Contracts 5.3.1 FIDIC's Model Forms: A General Exposition 5.3.2 Environmental Concerns and FIDIC Model Contracts 5.3.3 Critique of the Contemporary Contractual Response to the Environment-Construction Dilemma 5.3.4 A Different Contractual Vision? 5.4 The Engineering Ethos and Other 'Contributing' Factors 6. Transnational Environmental Litigation 6.1 The Phenomenon of Transnational Environmental Litigation 6.2 Conceptual Anachronism in the Law Governing Transnational Environmental Litigation: The Doctrines of Legal Jurisdiction and Corporate Entity 6.2.1 Exposition 6.2.2 Doctrinal Disharmony and International Unfairness: A Closer Look into the Concepts of Forum Non Conveniens and Corporate Entity 6.3 Cracks in the Traditional Doctrines: The Contemporary Anglo-American Jurisprudence 6.3.1 The English Case Law 6.3.2 The United States Federal and State Case Law (a) The Alien Tort Claims Act (b) Foreign Environmental Litigation in US State Courts 6.4 New Paths? Emerging International Norms 6.5 Conclusions 7. International Financial Law as a New Locus for Environmental Action 7.1 Supply-Side Regulation 7.2 Demand-Side Regulation 7.3 Environmental and Financial Reporting 7.4 Conclusions 8. Conclusions Bibliography Index |